Health Care Reform - Full Article

By John Mackey, August 14, 2009  |  Meet the Blogger  |  More Posts by John Mackey

As you are probably aware, I wrote an Op/Ed piece that was published in the Wall Street Journal earlier this week on health care reform, one of the biggest and most emotional issues facing our country. I was asked to write an Op/Ed piece and I gave my personal opinions. While I am in favor of health care reform, Whole Foods Market as a company has no official position on the issue.

 

In answer to President Obama's invitation to all Americans to put forward constructive ideas for reforming our health care system, I wrote this Op/Ed piece called simply "Health Care Reform." An editor at the Journal rewrote the headline to call it "Whole Foods Alternative to Obamacare," which led to antagonistic feelings by many. That was not my intention - in fact, I do not mention the President at all in this piece.

 

I fully realize that there are many opinions on the healthcare debate, including inside my own company. As we, as a nation, continue to discuss this, I am hopeful that both sides can do so in a civil manner that will lead to positive change for all concerned. You are welcome to share your thoughts in the comments section below. (Just remember our comment guidelines prohibit vulgarity and personal attacks.)

 

Here is the original unedited version that I submitted.

 

Health Care Reform

 

"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money" —Margaret Thatcher.

 

With a projected $1.8 trillion deficit for 2009, several trillions more in deficits projected over the next decade, and with both Medicare and Social Security entitlement spending about to ratchet up several notches over the next 15 years as Baby Boomers become eligible for both, we are rapidly running out of other people's money. These deficits are simply not sustainable and they are either going to result in unprecedented new taxes and inflation or they will bankrupt us.

 

While we clearly need health care reform, the last thing our country needs is a massive new health care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and moves us much closer to a complete governmental takeover of our health care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the exact opposite direction-toward less governmental control and more individual empowerment. Here are eight reforms that would greatly lower the cost of health care for everyone:

 

1. Remove the legal obstacles which slow the creation of high deductible health insurance plans and Health Savings Accounts. The combination of high deductible health insurance and Health Savings Accounts is one solution that could solve many of our health care problems. For example, Whole Foods Market pays 100% of the premiums for all our team members who work 30 hours or more per week (about 89% of all team members) for our high deductible health insurance plan, and provides up to $1,800 per year in additional health care dollars through deposits into their own Personal Wellness Accounts to spend as they choose on their own health and wellness. Money not spent in one year rolls over to the next and grows over time. Our team members therefore spend their own health care dollars until the annual deductible is covered (about $2,500) and the insurance plan kicks in. This creates incentives to spend the first $2,500 more carefully. Our plan's costs are much lower than typical health insurance, while providing a very high degree of team member satisfaction.

 

2. Change the tax laws so that that employer-provided health insurance and individually owned health insurance have exactly the same tax benefits. Right now employer health insurance benefits are fully tax deductible for employers but private health insurance is not. This is unfair.

 

3. Repeal all state laws which prevent insurance companies from competing across state lines. We should all have the legal right to purchase health insurance from any insurance company in any state and we should be able use that health insurance wherever we live. Health insurance should be portable everywhere.

 

4. Repeal all government mandates regarding what insurance companies must cover. These mandates have increased the cost of health insurance many billions of dollars. What is insured and what is not insured should be determined by individual health insurance customer preferences and not through special interest lobbying.

 

5. Enact tort reform to end the ruinous lawsuits that force doctors into paying insurance costs of hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. These costs are ultimately being passed back to us through much higher prices for health care.

 

6. Make health care costs transparent so that consumers will understand what health care treatments cost. How many people know what their last doctor's visit cost? What other goods or services do we as consumers buy without knowing how much they will cost us? We need a system where people can compare and contrast costs and services.

 

7. Enact Medicare reform: we need to face up to the actuarial fact that Medicare is heading towards bankruptcy and move towards greater patient empowerment and responsibility.

 

8. Permit individuals to make voluntary tax deductible donations on their IRS tax forms to help the millions of people who have no insurance and aren't covered by Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP or any other government program.

 

Many promoters of health care reform believe that people have an intrinsic ethical right to health care-to universal and equal access to doctors, medicines, and hospitals. While all of us can empathize with those who are sick, how can we say that all people have any more of an intrinsic right to health care than they have an intrinsic right to food, clothing, owning their own homes, a car or a personal computer? Health care is a service which we all need at some point in our lives, but just like food, clothing, and shelter it is best provided through voluntary and mutually-beneficial market exchanges rather than through government mandates. A careful reading of both The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution will not reveal any intrinsic right to health care, food or shelter, because there isn't any. This "right" has never existed in America.

 

Even in countries such as Canada and the U.K., there is no intrinsic right to health care. Rather, citizens in these countries are told by governmental bureaucrats what health care treatments and medicines they are eligible to receive and when they can receive them. All countries with socialized medicine ration health care by forcing their citizens to wait in lines to receive scarce and expensive treatments. Although Canada has a population smaller than California, 830,000 Canadians are waiting to be admitted to a hospital or to get treatment. In England, the waiting list is 1.8 million citizens. At Whole Foods we allow our team members to vote on what benefits they most want the company to fund on their behalf. Our Canadian and British team members express their benefit preferences very clearly-they want supplemental health care more than additional paid time off, larger donations to their retirement plans, or greater food discounts; they want health care dollars that they can control and spend themselves without permission from their governments. Why would they want such additional health care benefit dollars to spend if they already have an "intrinsic right to health care"? The answer is clear: no such right truly exists in either Canada or the U.K. or in any other country.

 

Rather than increase governmental spending and control, what we need to do is address the root causes of disease and poor health. This begins with the realization that every American adult is responsible for their own health. Unfortunately many of our health care problems are self-inflicted with over 2/3 of Americans now overweight and 1/3 obese. Most of the diseases which are both killing us and making health care so expensive-heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, and obesity, which account for about 70% of all health care spending, are mostly preventable through proper diet, exercise, not smoking, minimal or no alcohol consumption, and other healthy lifestyle choices.

American Diet

Over the past two decades, breakthrough scientific research by Colin Campbell, as documented in his book The China Study, and clinical medical experiences by many doctors including Dean Ornish, Caldwell Esselstyn, John McDougall, Joel Fuhrman, and Neal Barnard have shown that a diet consisting of whole foods which are plant-based, nutrient dense, and low-fat will help prevent and often reverse most of the degenerative diseases that are killing us, and becoming more and more expensive to treat through drugs and surgery. We should be able to live healthy and largely disease free lives until we are well into our 90's and even past 100 years of age.

 

Health care reform in America is very important. Whatever reforms are enacted it is essential that they be financially responsible and that we have the freedom to choose our own doctors and the health care services that best suit our own unique set of lifestyle choices. We are responsible for our own lives and our own health. We should take that responsibility very seriously and use our freedom to make wise lifestyle choices that will protect our health. Doing so will enrich our personal lives and will help create a vibrant and sustainable American society.

Category: health care reform

 

4,664 Comments

Comments

Mark Osborne says ...
<p>I appreciate Mr. Mackey's stand in proposing an alternative to a complete government takeover of the healthcare industry. I have liked Whole Foods for years ' I like them even more now and will shop there more in the future.</p>
08/14/2009 7:16:00 PM CDT
Kate says ...
<p>I loved shopping at Whole Foods, but I can't support a company run by a CEO who believes what you espoused in the WSJ. What you advocate would mean the government is flush and doctors will be wealthier, but millions of American people will either suffer and die for lack of health care and funds to pay for medicines, tests, and treatments OR they will end being bankrupted by health costs. </p> <p>I'd love it if insurance companies were so cool they would work with what you've outlined. But they are greedy and do not care if we live or die. Apparently you don't either. </p> <p>We used to spend upwards of $500 a month at Whole Foods. Until you are no longer employed by the company we will not shop there.</p>
08/14/2009 7:16:00 PM CDT
dave says ...
<p>you think health care should be bought and sold like a personal computer? how do you put a price on life saving treatment? if a person cannot afford chemotherapy they should be allowed to die?</p>
08/14/2009 7:19:00 PM CDT
Pat B says ...
<p>Not much to say other than I can't imagine what would compel me to set foot in a Whole Foods store again. I'm kind of ashamed of myself for what I've already spent there.</p>
08/14/2009 7:20:00 PM CDT
Charlie says ...
<p>I read your WSJ article, and also read that some folks are now boycotting the store. I have been driving over 120 miles roundtrip weekly to purchase all my groceries for over 15 years and I do not plan to cease that. In fact I am encouraged by your position and wanted to voice my support to you and your entire team at Whole Foods. In my opinion all you did was give some excellent alternatives to socialized health care. You expressed an informed opinion, which is still legal. Your arguments were reasonable and valid. I support your right to free speech and I also agree with your sentiments. Please do not let the naive naysayers bother you. Keep up the good work!</p>
08/14/2009 7:22:00 PM CDT
M. D. Hardy, M.D. says ...
<p>What perversion of sanity transmuted accessibility to medical care into a 'right'? I can understand that one has the right to contract with a plumber to provide a service for a fee. I can understand that one has the right to buy groceries from whomever he chooses. I can understand that one has the right to offer his goods or services for a price that he considers appropriate, and that the person who desires those goods or services has the right to seek another source for those goods or services if he thinks the price is too high or the quality of the product is not satisfactory. Such is the nature of a free society; such is the nature of moral commerce between individuals.</p> <p>When one man, by force, expropriates the goods or services provided by another man, we call him a thief. When one man is forced, either by a gun held to his head, or by government edict, to provide goods or services for less than they would be worth in a free society, we call him a slave. When thievery by one group of people, and enslavement of another group becomes the law of the land, is this not antithetical to all that America has stood for?</p> <p>As a physician, I personally get a great deal of satisfaction out of taking care of someone who, through no fault of his own, cannot afford to pay the fee I would ordinarily expect to be paid. The 'pay' I receive in these instances is, on the basis of my moral code, adequate, and it is something I've chosen to do. That patient is not a thief; I am not his slave.</p> <p>Such would not be the case under House Bill 3200 (or any of the other bills that I'm aware of) now being considered in Congress. And just as my ability to contract with patients in a free-market fashion would be destroyed, so would patients' rights to decide on what care they receive be terminated.</p> <p>Do you really want a government bureaucrat deciding what level of care you receive? Do you really want someone who feels enslaved providing your medical care?</p> <p>Thank you, Mr. Mackey, for, with your voice and your pen, standing up for America and all Americans (even though some seem not realize that's what you are doing)</p>
08/14/2009 7:23:00 PM CDT
Your Primary Demographic says ...
<p>Absurd. A billionaire's 'I've got mine so you just need to endure' vision of health care. The selective omission of what is subsidized (i.e., socialized) fully in this country and which allows corporations like WF to even function is cleverly ' or stupidly ' disregarded. History tends not to be charitable to Mackeys; he who hoped to be regarded as the Andrew Carnegie of Arugula must now contend with irrevocably alienating his primary (educated, affluent, mobile) customer base.</p> <p>As for myself, I'll be shopping locally &amp; organically, patronizing small businesses that, with the aid of a just universal health care plan, will be WF's uncrushable competition. Not even hiding under pseudonyms will protect WF's CEO from that market freedom.</p>
08/14/2009 7:23:00 PM CDT
Jenny Bou (kids' book author) says ...
<p>Mr. Mackey ' You may have lost Cindy Lou, but you are gaining 'Jenny Bou' and her family. My daughter is allergic to corn, so I find your store has the most options for us. After reading your Op/Ed, I stopped by the Buckhead location on my way home from work today and picked up dinner for my family. BTW- I love your Tuna Tartare. It is the best! </p> <p>Keep fighting for Freedom! Moo wah!</p>
08/14/2009 7:24:00 PM CDT
A very disappointed and now former shopper says ...
<p>Another thought- if Canadians are so very unhappy with their health care system, please tell me why the man who created that system (Tommy Douglas)was named in 2004 as 'The Greatest Canadian' of ALL TIME?? To put that in context, Wayne Gretzky only came in at #10.</p> <p>They seem to have their priorities in order up there in Canada. No doubt there are some detractors, but no system is without its critics. At least the ones up there will live to criticize!</p>
08/14/2009 7:26:00 PM CDT
Mary says ...
<p>I rarely shopped at Whole Foods, but I will shop there regularly now. Thank you, Mr. Mackey, for showing the courage to speak up with honesty and intelligence.</p>
08/14/2009 7:26:00 PM CDT
R. Duffy says ...
<p>I 'WHOLE' heartedly agree with you'please-please-please don't buckle to the pressure from the left. I happily travel 30 miles to your store in Madison, NJ and will continue to do so. You founded your store on the principals that made this country great, and you have every right to voice your opinion. There are more who agree with you, than disagree; we are not as vocal because we have a JOB to go to every morning'¦..But I think the tide is turning'¦</p>
08/14/2009 7:27:00 PM CDT
Ravi V says ...
<p>You just lost another customer'¦.Trader Joes rules unless their CEO writes moronic op-ed pieces like you.</p>
08/14/2009 7:28:00 PM CDT
cory says ...
<p>Unfortunately, mainstream supermarkets are full of unhealthy, heavily marketed products.</p> <p>It is unreasonable to blame people for buying what has been made most available to them by companies who prefer to keep consumers ignorant.</p>
08/14/2009 7:32:00 PM CDT
S. Devga says ...
<p>That quote from Mrs. Thatcher is interesting.</p> <p>Unfortunately you misquoted her.</p> <p>Margaret Thatcher, in a TV interview for Thames TV This Week [[1]]on Feb. 5, 1976, Prime Minister Thatcher said, ''¦and Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess. They [socialists] always run out of other people's money. It's quite a characteristic of them.'</p> <p>'The socialists ALWAYS run out of other people's money'</p> <p>But history has proven her wrong. The National Health system has been running for 61 years. They haven't run out of money yet.</p> <p>Good luck to you. You've neglected to build stores in strong conservative areas. Massachusetts alone has more stores than Utah, Missouri, Alabama, Arkanas, Louisiana and Kentucky combined. Mississippi and Alaska don't even have one between them.</p> <p>It's gong to take you years to build stores in conservative areas like Charlotte NC, while the existing stores in liberal areas like the Triangle, NC will decline.</p> <p>Bad business plan.</p> <p>But you've sold your stock. You don't care about the stock holders. </p> <p>History will prove you wrong just like it did to Mrs Thatcher.</p>
08/14/2009 7:32:00 PM CDT
Bob Whiteman says ...
<p>Mr. Mackey,</p> <p>You start out by indirectly labeling the current proposal by the Dems 'socialism,' framed by Thatcher's quote. Fine. It's also true that many of your workers and former employees have been kept alive by the good fortune of our nation's medicare plan, which is pure socialism, as is social security. And you realize that many aspects of our current economic system are rooted in socialism, if not pure socialism such as social security. It's fine that you've found a good fit for some of your employees'though I doubt that every employee, as you say, would agree with you.<br> It's funny'¦where was this outrage when our nation was pissing away billions if not trillions when it's all said and done on a war of lie in Iraq? At least the party in charge today is attempting to find a solution to a huge problem in America, which admittedly you agree with.<br> Half of the fools who are arguing against President Obama's efforts benefit from social security and/or medicare at this very moment; the other half have no idea what they are speaking about and keep arguing that 'Granny will die,' which ironically already happens when bean counters get their hands on our private plans.<br> You've drawn a line in the sand, sir, and many of us will now do the same thing. You've traded a lot for a few, and let's see how the right likes their arugala.</p>
08/14/2009 7:35:00 PM CDT
James says ...
<p>Firstly, I moved from Canada to the USA to be with my American wife. So I know exactly what the Canadian health care system is like. Stop the damned lies please.</p> <p>Secondly, the American health care system sucks big time. When I moved here I was denied coverage by Kaiser Permanente in California for a physical disability because of a military accident in Canada. Isn't it nice that you Americans can discriminate against people who have a disability? </p> <p>Thirdly, if there is anything I'd like to keep from Canada it would have been my medical coverage. At least I did not have to worry about anything. The Canadian medical system is great. I could go to any doctor in any clinic or even to any emergency room (when necessary) for FREE. No going bankrupt for anything. How you Americans can be proud of your medical system is astounding. I would hang my head in shame.</p> <p>Mr. Mackey'¦ You are clueless when it comes to what goes on in Canada. Before you speak nonsense you should actually do some research.</p> <p>BTW, Canada has a single payer medical system and it did not turn Canada into a socialist country. Jesus, you Americans make me sick with your 'socialist' rants. You have 'socialist' type medical systems in place with the military and Medicare for seniors. What's the problem?</p> <p>I don't understand why the government doesn't just extend Medicare to ALL citizens and permanent residents. It would be a very short bill to read in Congress instead of this ridiculous circus going on right now.</p>
08/14/2009 7:37:00 PM CDT
Ronald Goldstein says ...
<p>Your 'plan,' Mr Mackey, fails to address corruption at insurance companies. The answer to our health care problems lies not in less regulation. Too many people are cheated by insurance companies that cancel policies and refuse services. I have received refusals of service from insurance companies which were only rectified when I threatened legal action. Tort reform will not help consumers.</p> <p>You are wrong! And I am distressed to find out that you support a campaign against a public option for health insurance.</p> <p>My family spends about $10,000 a year at Whole Foods Market and now we are looking for an alternative. Maybe this is not important to you, but I have no other way to vote against your plan and your campaign.</p>
08/14/2009 7:39:00 PM CDT
Tammie says ...
<p>Appreciate your view and comments. My company subsidizes our HSA which really helps but we still must contribute to meet the deductible.</p> <p>I don't believe I should be required to pay for everyone else's health care, especially non-citizens. I'm pretty sure I'm already contributing to their care through the medical costs I pay. Hospitals and doctors must cover non-payment of services somehow. I realize that some people really hit hard times and can't pay their bills. I also realize that some people choose not to have insurance because they are young and healthy. Some are free-loading on the United States' good graces. Our government should not be involved in health care and managing that system. They generally aren't that great at managing business. Spending is currently out of control and they want to raise the deficit limit. It seems to me they've lost their minds and any common sense they may have had.</p> <p>I haven't shopped much at Whole Foods in the past because it is out of my way and more expensive. I'll be making more of an effort to shop Whole Foods now.</p>
08/14/2009 7:39:00 PM CDT
Hank Lee says ...
<p>Mr. Mackey, if one of your stores was robbed and your profits put in jeopardy, you would expect the law enforcement officials to respond to your pleas for help. That is what a compassionate society does for each other. Yet nowhere in the Constitution does it state that the gov't must provide security to protect your profits. Why not just have the market prevail? Contract out all your security needs to companies such as Xe and pay them on a monthly retainer or on a 'pay as you're robbed' basis. No need to have tax dollars go for law enforcement. I mean, are not income taxes socialism? </p> <p>I will be taking the $500/mth I currently spend at WF elsewhere, to a company that actually believes in supporting the society that so greatly enriches its coffers.</p>
08/14/2009 7:43:00 PM CDT
ZeissMan says ...
<p>Thank you John. It is time to speak the truth. See you tomorrow for sushi and some wine.</p>
08/14/2009 7:43:00 PM CDT
Dorothy says ...
<p>Your ideas about health care are typical of a rich, white Republican. You have no clue how it feels to be poor, self employed or have illness that prevent your getting health care. I will no longer shop at your store. Before you wrote this you should have thought about who buys your products.</p>
08/14/2009 7:43:00 PM CDT
Sarah O'Dell says ...
<p>Mr. Markey,</p> <p>You've just lost a loyal, longtime customer of Whole Foods who goes dates back to the days of Fresh Fields. I will never shop in Whole Foods again and will watch with interest to see how your comments and idealogy impact your business. It's unfortunate.</p>
08/14/2009 7:44:00 PM CDT
Former Canadian Whole Foods customer says ...
<p>Hello All, </p> <p>I want to make an important point regarding Mr. Mackey's Wall Street Journal article: I just researched the Investors Business Daily article John Mackey cites for his quotes regarding healthcare in Canada and England'you know, the part about 830,000 people waiting for medical treatment, or the '1.8 million deep' British people waiting for treatment at the hands of the 'heartless, cold and uncaring socialist bureaucrats'. So here is what I found out'¦</p> <p>So who wrote this article for Investors Business Daily? Nobody: no author is even cited! And oh, yeah: the Heritage Foundation (an infamous right wing think tank that counts among its ilk Karl Rove and Dick Cheney) is quoted as one of the sources for the highly dubious claims of higher mortality in European countries with socialized healthcare. To quote the Heritage Foundation on anything is to quote an extremely biased, neo-conservative pro-corporate think tank with an agenda. Hardly a trustworthy source of objective, scientific data on healthcare outcomes, Mr. Mackey.</p> <p>But there's more: Not only is NO AUTHOR cited for the Investor Business Daily article Mr. Mackey quotes from, but further NO CITATIONS are given for the so-called long waiting lines in Canada and Europe! For all we know these long lists are just made up'by a phantom author no less. </p> <p>Finally: can we trust Investor Business Daily'a stock market website'for objective, unbiased information on healthcare comparisons between USA and Canada/Europe? No, we can't: they are cheerleaders for American health insurance corporations and their stock holders.</p> <p>Mr. Mackey quotes bogus statistics without citations to verify, or quotes statistics from the militant right wink think tank Heritage Foundation'an article without an author! Little wonder Americans are so confused about healthcare reform: they are being fed lies and misinformation like Mr. Mackey is using in his Wall Street Journal article.</p>
08/14/2009 7:48:00 PM CDT
Monique Mugg says ...
<p>Thank you Mr. Mackey, I share your view and though there are no Whole Foods near me (wish there were), the next time I visit family in Chicago, I will frequent WF, as I always do. Your ideas are constructive and well thought out.</p>
08/14/2009 7:48:00 PM CDT
Dennis Kelly says ...
<p>Mr. Mackey,<br> This formerly very loyal Whole Foods customer will not shop there again as long as Mr. Mackey opposes the Obama health care reform plan.</p>
08/14/2009 7:48:00 PM CDT

Pages